Archives for December 2013

The dishonesty of atheism

Though I'm not a public figure by any stretch of the imagination, I've learned that it's a good idea to occasionally search the internet for my name, to see if anything posted out there was directed specifically towards me. It isn't a question of vanity as much as not wanting to demonstrate bad manners by ignoring a serious attempt to communicate with me. My most recent search turned up this article by author Dianna Narciso that was originally published over two years ago. She had responded to something I wrote during my time spent as the Atlanta Creationism Examiner. For whatever reason, her article never appeared in the first few pages of search results before now. Oh well. Better late than never, I guess... Ms. Narciso asserted that she is not a close-minded freethinker. We'll see. I don't get very far into her article before Ms. Narciso writes, "Mr. Leonard, I am very sorry to disappoint you. But you do, indeed, believe what you believe without rational thought." Really! That seems an incredibly presumptuous thing to say. What sources of information gave her such great insight? On what basis was her opinion formed? Without reading my books, or more than one article I've written, how on earth can Ms. Narciso possibly know what I believe? More importantly, does she even have a clue as to why I believe what I believe? Has she read Divine Evolution? If Ms. Narciso is actually interested in learning the science necessary to present a coherent argument for her atheism, the end notes of my book Counterargument for God might prove quite helpful. My … [Read more...]

The problem with speciation theory

Speciation is the scientific theory attempting to identify the biological mechanisms by which a single ancestral species of organism differentiates, or "evolves", into more than one descendant species. The term "macro evolution" is often substituted inappropriately for speciation theory, creating the false impression that speciation is nothing more than a logical extrapolation of Darwin's theory of natural selection. But it isn't. As I wrote in my book Counterargument for God, either two members of the same ancestor species eventually spawn offspring of a new species, or members of two different species produce a fertile hybrid species. There doesn't really seem to be a viable third alternative, at least not one that doesn't involve creation by some form of supernatural intelligence. In an effort to clarify my understanding of how speciation theory supposedly worked, I wrote an open letter to biologist Dr. Jerry Coyne, author of the book Why Evolution is True. Apparently, Dr. Coyne couldn't find time to respond. However, his fellow biologist, Dr. Benoit LeBlanc, was kind enough to answer my questions. Dr. LeBlanc confirmed that my "basic understanding of the [speciation] process was sound", but suggested the reason my conclusions were all wrong because I simply don't know enough about biology. No offense intended, he said. None taken, Dr. LeBlanc. But I am still confused. In my analysis of Dr. Coyne's work previously deemed sound, I noted he speculated that speciation only seemed possible when a small breeding population comprised of members of a … [Read more...]